The History of: Duck Feet

In the early twentieth century watermen witnessed swim fins evolve from sticky palm fronds to meticulously crafted tools. One of the largest advances in that evolution was forged by Arthur H. Brown. Living in Southern California, Arthur was described as an expert diver in his day. At the time, Churchill Swim Fins were the only option for increased propulsion in the Ocean. He imagined a fin that provided more thrust and floated. His new symmetrical fin would stand in stark contrast to it’s predecessors and create die-hard fans from the very beginning.

Brown began the production of Duck Feet in a canyon near Laguna Beach, California. With the ambitious goal of creating a powerful floating fin, he studied rubber and the modern vulcanization process. He began producing fins under the company name “The Spearfisherman Co.” along with other skin diver focused products. In 1946, following many years of work, Spearfisherman Co. produced their first batch of fins for civilian use. As early as 1950 the fins were produced in both the regular size and Giant UDT. Both types were brown and made of pure gum rubber. These fins looked very similar to the Duck Feet Fins bodysurfers know and love today. Arthur was always tinkering with his molds and adjusting his rubber compounds, but this first shape is indicative of his earliest efforts. The photograph below was taken in Spearfisherman’s second manufacturing facility located in Huntington Beach. You can see in the photograph, both the early Regular and UDT models featured the “faded middle rib” design.

duck feet fin history, manufactured by Spearfisherman Company, Huntington Beach, California.
Duck Feet manufactured by Spearfisherman Company, Huntington Beach, California, 1951

In 1950 the Korean Conflict was initiated and as is common during war-time commerce, certain resources become scarce. One such resource was the Ceylon, which was key to the manufacture of Spearfisherman’s unique invisible fins (pictured below). Brown continued to produce these fins after, but he had to create new compounds to do so. The real genius of Arthur Brown is not his fin design, but in his manufacturing work.

In an article written by Brown himself for Skin Diver Magazine, he details the process of manufacturing rubber fins. He describes the arduous task of turning raw rubber from Malay or Indonesia into vulcanized floating fins. Vulcanization is the process by which raw rubber from trees is chemically treated and compressed to make useful rubber products. Early in the nineteenth century, Charles Goodyear found that by mixing raw rubber with sulfur and applying heat he was able to produce a rubber far more valuable to commercial purposes. Just over 100 years later, Arthur Brown stood on Goodyear’s shoulders and produced the most powerful swim fin to date.

Modern fin producers inject prepared rubber into metal molds in order to vulcanize their final product. Arthur Brown pioneered this process in the 1940’s, forever changing the fin and aquatic goods industry. One of the most important steps in his innovation is the ability to use different rubber compounds on different parts of the fin.  Previous fins were made of the same rubber mix, so if your footpocket was soft on your toes, your blade was just as soft. Brown was able to keep a stiff blade of one rubber type and inject stretchy rubber into the heel strap. Divers marveled at the floating, giant fins with deep channels and stretchable heel straps.

Brown’s design garnered more than just civilian attention. Naval Underwater Demolition Team sailors began using Duck Feet. The Spearfisherman produced a line of fins designed specifically for U.D.T. purposes. They were not only shaped to be much larger than the standard model, he also used “extra-stiff rubber.” These original UDT fins weighed 6 pounds and had more thrust per kick than anything else in the water. In 1956, the Navy Experimental Diving Unit out of Washington D.C., under the direction of then IT. Walter Mazone performed a formal evaluation of fins for military purposes. The tests were performed by 12 testers and they tried each of 14 commercially available fins. Both Standard and Giant U.D.T. Duck Feet were included in the testing, but it was the Giant U.D.T. fins which tested third highest in efficiency. The overall results of the tests were mixed, but Brown claimed his fins were a favorite among Pacific stationed U.D.T. servicemen and historical photographs support his claim.

Despite all of Brown’s manufacturing achievements, in the end he was unable to make Spearfisherman Co. a stable business and in February, 1957 Ken Noris’s Pacific Moulded Product Co. purchased Spearfisherman Co. and all of the innovations Arthur Brown had developed. Pacific Moulded Products had already acquired Swimaster and under the Swimaster branch of the company Duck Feet would continue to be manufactured.

History of Duck Feet Fins

The Swimaster team, under the direction of pioneering LA.CO. underwater instructor Harry Vetter, would leave their mark on the evolution of Duck Feet Fins in many ways. In the same year Swimaster took over production, Duck Feet were made available in black or “ebony” as they called it. The manufacturing change is indicated on the actual fins themselves as well, with Swimaster replacing the previous Spearfisherman stamp. With the new ownership, Duck Feet fins were more aggressively marketed, resulting in a handful of classic fin advertisements (shown below).

Beyond marketing, Swimaster also expanded the models of Duck Feet. By 1961 Swimaster was producing the Giant UDT, Regulation, Custom and Full Foot models. The Custom model resembling the original duck foot mold with an incomplete middle rail and made of softer rubber.

Duck Feet Fin Advertisement with John Steel artwork
In this rare advertisement you can see all four Duck Feet models of the day.

Swimaster carried the Duck Feet brand proudly for seven years and under their stewardship the fins continued to grow in popularity. In 1962, W.J. Voit Rubber Corp.  announced a merger with Swimaster. Voit would take over marketing of Duck Feet and Swimaster technicians would focus on the expanding manufacturing in order to meet the growing demand.

Voit continues to manufacture and market Duck Feet presently. It isn’t clear, when they stopped using the Swimaster name and switch to marketing solely as Voit Duck Feet. You will also notice some Duck Feet models are stamped with AMF (American Machine & Foundry) because Voit is a subsidiary of the industrial behemoth. Along with the name changes, Voit would make adjustments to the beloved fins as well. In attempt to make the Giant UDT more comfortable, the engineers redesigned the footpocket to be rounder and softer. You can spot this change on the fin because they also tapered the center rib to fade before the foot instep. This mold remains unchanged and the UDT Model fins currently on the market share the same basic shape as the 1965 model.

As the years passed, Voit made few adjustments to the Custom Model mold. It eventually became synonymous with Duck Feet, as the Full Foot and Regulation models were phased out of production. The UDT model was moved around with the molds being lost and eventually found in Mexico, but the Custom Model remained the same. Sometime in the 1970’s the Duck Feet Custom Model was produced in two tone blue (above left). Those fins are identifiable by their lack of drainage holes. After the blue, came the “naval orange” version. There would be many more color variations to follow over the years. Voit would eventually add the two drainage holes at the base and mix the rubber compounds to adjust hardness.  The color changes rolled on from brown-black (shown above), black-blue-green to the more recent additions of green-blue and lifeguard inspired red-yellow. Each revision of Arthur Brown’s original innovation let bodysurfers and Ocean enthusiasts experience their passions to ever expanding depths and now we can truly appreciate his pioneering work that made it all possible.

EJ

 

Special thanks to Historical Diving expert Dr. Sam Miller III for research guidance and support. This article would not have been possible without his contribution.

Thank you also to David Ritchie Wilson for research into the U.S. Military’s study of fins.

‘Umi and Pai’ea- Kaha Nalu

Reprinted from John R.K. Clark’s book, HawaiianSurfing
Hawaiian Surfing: Traditions From the Past.

Perhaps the most famous description of bodysurfing is found in the story of ‘Umi and Pai’ea, two chiefs from the island of Hawai’i who were both skillful bodysurfers. When ‘Umi as a young chief visited Laupāhoehoe, Pai’ea challenged him to a heihei, or bodysurfing contest to see who could get the longest ride on the same wave. ‘Umi and Pai’ea caught a wave together, but during the ride, Pai’ea crowded ‘Umi into a rock, causing ‘Umi to injure his shoulder. ‘Umi still won the contest, but years later, when he was king of the island of Hawai’i, he put Pai’ea to death for this incident. In the passage that follows, the writer offers a version of the story, which at the same time provides a description of traditional bodysurfing.  

Photo: Neal Miyake
Photo: Neal Miyake

‘Umi and his wives went sea bathing, surfing (he’e nalu), riding on the surf (kaha nalu), and a certain chief of Laupāhoehoe noticed ‘Umi’s skill in surf riding. His name was Pai’ea, and he knew all the surfs and the best one to ride. It was the one directly in front of Laupāhoehoe, facing Hilo. It was a huge one which none dared to ride except Pai’ea, who was noted for his skill. Gambling on surfing was practiced in that locality. All of the inhabitants from Waipunalei to Ka’ula placed their wager on ‘Umi and those of Laupāhoehoe on Pai’ea. The two rode the surf, and while surfing, Pai’ea noticed that ‘Umi was winning. As they drew near a rock, Pai’ea crowded him against it, skinning his side. ‘Umi won against Pai’ea, and because he crowded ‘Umi against the rock with the intention of killing him, Pai’ea was roasted in an imu in later years. 
       –Kamakau. Ruling Chiefs.  p. 10-11

Clark, John R. K. Hawaiian Surfing: Traditions from the Past. Honolulu: U of Hawaiʻi, 2011. Print.

*Cover photo: Brian Yee- @808makuatomakai

Credit: Brian Yee- @808makuatomakai
Credit: Brian Yee- @808makuatomakai

Bodysurf Skills Required

Bodysurfing is an art unto itself, no board required. However, there was a time when the world’s pioneers of surf considered bodysurfing skills to be a prerequisite. When they paddled out to explore towering Makaha or bombing Waimea, there was no safety patrol to ski wipeouts to the sand. These guys had no choice, but to be complete watermen.

Eddie Aikau could bodysurf by Jeff Divine
Eddie Aikau was the embodiment of the word waterman. Photographed by Jeff Divine

An early version of the surfboard leash was used by Tom Blake in the 1930s. He tried tying his belt to his surfboard using a cotton rope. Tom abandoned his invention, deciding it was too dangerous. Throughout the decades, others tried linking the fate of man and board. The French were early adopters of the ankle leash. In the early 1970s leashes were being marketed to the everyday surfer. Some of the old guard complained that leashes allow surfers who aren’t ready for bigger waves to take them on too early. Others claimed they made surfing more dangerous. Despite their protest, leashes have become almost universal with over 99% of surfers wearing leashes.

Surfing in the pre-leash days is hard to imagine for those of us who’ve grown up in the post-leash era. The sheer emptiness of breaks on overhead surf days would be startling. I try imagine what it must have been like to take a hard wipeout at big Makaha back then. Trying desperately to avoid hitting my own board, having no leash to climb for the surface and when the wave finally lets me rise for a breath the real nightmare begins. How lonely it must have felt, to be a speck in the torrent of the Sea without fins or a board to aid an escape. With the invention of the modern leash, surf companies essentially killed the surfer-waterman inevitability.

It means something different to be a surfer these days. What is lost? Those extraordinary riders who are still pushing the limits of paddle-in big wave surfing carry the torch. In their line of work the principles of understanding the Ocean’s energy and the ability to manage one’s own safety has infinite value. I would argue, those same principles should have never lost that value.

-E

 

For more information about the history of the surf leash check out the Encyclopedia Of Surfing.

The History of Blackball at Wedge

The following article is an historical account of the Blackball Flag and its significance to the bodysurfing culture at Wedge. The referenced Ordinance and Resolutions are attached to the bottom of the article for those who seek more information. Feel free to contact swelllinesmag@gmail.com to provide more information or personal accounts referenced throughout the article.

The modern form of bodysurfing has been around since the early years of the 20th century. In those days, bodysurfing was the most popular water sport. Many of the top bodysurfers were also top athletes of their time. Olympians like Wally O’Connor raved about the “thrills, pleasure and exercise of body surfing.” It attracted many well-known football players of the mid-century too. With all these highly competitive people pushing each other to bodysurf bigger and better waves along the southern California coast, it is no surprise many found a sticking point at the end of the Balboa Peninsula.

Bodysurfers are reported to have found Wedge sometime near the 1930’s. They called it “The Hook.” These early pioneers hurled themselves over the falls with rudimentary tools and no social media. Wedge stayed that way for many years. By the 1960’s, there was a dedicated contingent of bodysurfers and as the number of beach goers throughout Newport continued to grow the City Council was forced to shape new policies.

In April of 1966 the Newport City Council issued Ordinance 1162. They designated surfing areas to protect surf bathers from “hazardous surfing.” The council decided the best way to communicate these established areas was through the use of signal flags. “The authority to prohibit surfing set forth in subsection (b) may be exercised by displaying signal flags consisting of a solid black circle on a yellow background. When such flags are displayed on the beach they shall signify that surfing is prohibited.” Newport City Council had officially adopted the Blackball Flag as a tool to protect the public. They had no idea how iconic this symbol would become.

W TowerWedge was not included in the early Blackball adoption. It wasn’t until 1978 that Wedge would be added to the protected beaches 12-4 p.m. during the summer months. The dedicated local crew of bodysurfers continued to grow and evolve through these ancestral generations. Alternative craft riders like kneeboarders were also present. Tom Morey’s 1971 invention, the bodyboard, sent another flood of riders into the impressive wedging shore break. According to the 1978 resolution these riders were allowed to ride waves even when the Blackball Flag was flying because Blackball only prohibited stand-up surfing.

The Wedge landscape went through another transformation in 1985. According to hazy memories a bodysurfer was run over by a kneeboarder. The vocal bodysurfer urged the council to strengthen the blackball. The council agreed and in November of that same year Section 6 was added. Section 6 stated “All flotation devices such as boogie boards, surf mats, etc. are prohibited at the area commonly known as The “Wedge” when the Blackblall Flag is displayed.” This was the first direct reference to Wedge in official Newport Code. Wedge bodysurfers now had exclusive rights to the wave in the afternoon hours.

11086694_973397486011317_2003887813_nWhile the bodysurfers had fought to gain this time to safely practice their art, they were only scrapping for the wave during the worst hours of the day. In southern California surfers are lucky to have favorable winds as late as 10 a.m. much less 12 p.m. So, in 1993 the dedicated bodysurfers set up for another run at City Council. This time, the boys put on their Sunday’s best to ask for a chance to preserve bodysurfing’s roots and future at Wedge. This group of bodysurfers called themselves the Wedge Preservation Society and they are still around to this day.

Both sides of the issue brought their case before the Newport City Council. On the 10th of May 1993 Resolution NO. 93-33 was passed and the Blackball as we now know it was born. Three key changes were enacted. The Wedge area was clearly defined as the West Jetty to tower “P”. The blackballed hours were extended to include the hours between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. And the last major change was to extend the blackball period from May 1st through the end of October encompassing the bulk of southern California’s south swell window. The bodysurfing community, which first pioneered Wedge, now had means to safely carry on their craft for the years to come.

Fast-forward to 2014, under the guise of “fairness,” a group of photographers and board riders attempted to rally support against the current Blackball regulations at Wedge. Thanks to W.P.S. and the watchful eye of the other passionate bodysurfers, letters poured in from around the world to the Newport City Council expressing the importance in maintaining Wedge’s bodysurfing heritage. They decided to create a working group to gather data and put forward proposals the following year. On April 7, 2015 the Blackball Working Group recommended putting forward a resolution to both reduce the number of months Wedge Blackball should be enforced and to reduce the physical area defined as Wedge. They provided little relevant data to support the changes and in the end the resolution was not adopted. Modern Blackball policy may seem safe, but it is very clear that we cannot rest on our laurels. There are many parties of surf enthusiasts working hard to get a bigger share of Wedge waves. Whether their motives be to make money from selling photographs to the surf industry or simple greediness in hopes to surf Wedge beyond the prime morning/evening hours which they already control, we need to remain vigilant. Maintaining vocal support for the preservation of bodysurfing’s rightful place in the Wedge lineup is up to the cultural descendents of those first adventurous riders.

-EJ

1966 Ordinance 1162

1978 Resolution 9451

1985 Resolution 85-94

1993 Resolution 93-33

Innovation: Churchill Swim Fin Patent

In the 1940’s Owen P. Churchill designed innovations to Louis de Corlieu’s original swim fin patent. These innovations led to the efficacy and staying power of the modern rubber swim fin. Churchill’s original design is still popular today, 70 years after it’s creation. The following text and visual are from the original patent as referenced by Google Patents.

 

FinPatentJune 15, 1948. O. P. CHURCHILL 05 SWIM-FIN Original Filed Sept. 27, 1940 OWEN CHURCH/LL,

Rented June is, 1948 SWIM FIN Owen P. Churchill, Los Angeles, Calif.

Original No. 2,321,009, dated June 8, 1943. Serial No. 358,637, September 27. 1940. Application for reissue February 18, 1948, Serial No. 9,261

Claims.

My invention relates to a novel type of swim fin which is attached to the feet and is used as an aid in swimming, water treading, life-saving, and in other aquatic pursuits.

My invention more particularly relates to improvements in swimming devices, which are worn on the feet of the person engaged in aquatic activities and whereby the swimming speed is materially increased. My invention, in the experience of aquatic experts, instructors and professional swimmers, represents an efficient and practical improvement in swimming means. It has been approved and is being regularly employed by professional swimming instructors, coaches, swimmers, life guards and the like.

The use of devices embodying my invention enables a person to propel his body through the water at a materially increased speed and at a minimum of effort and fatigue. The device may be used with equal advantages for either long or short distance swimming.

The feet and legs of a human being were not designed by nature for swimming and other water activities and the use of my invention converts the feet into swimming members of correct hydrodynamic structure and design.

Swimming instructors employ devices incorporating my invention as it has been found that the use thereof gives confidence to beginners, and the art of swimming may be learned much more quickly and readily than where the unaided feet are relied on.

By increasing the speed of the swimmer the devices employing my invention likewise act to elevate the feet of the swimmer and thereby tend to overcome a problem which always confronts persons who are learning to swim, as it is difficult for a beginner to keep the feet elevated.

In addition to increased speed, the use of my invention enables a person to tread water much with great efficiency by persons engaged in diving. The devices may be employed in such sports and industries as the following: spearing fish, abalone hunting, lobster catching, pearl diving, etc. They may also be used very successfully for swimming under water or for standing in and treading water when it becomes necessary to inspect and disengage mooring lines and anchor chains of vessels which have become fouled or tangled and generally to inspect the condition of a vessels hull which is at or below the water line. In such connection the devices enable the user to have the free use of his hands and arms while supporting himself in the water by means of the devices in a substantially upright position.

My invention so materially increases the speed of a swimmer that ordinarily a person using same can swim as fast without his hands as he could by employing his feet and legs without the devices. The devices also enable life guards and others who desire to wear life belts and jackets to progress with material speed through the water, which is ordinarily very difficult, if not impossible, without the use of my invention.

Devices employing my invention can be used with equal efficiency for any kind of a kick employed in speed and short or long distance swimming. They have been found advantageous for the scissors kick, the flutter kick, the frog kick, and all other well known movements of the legs and feet which are variously employed by swim more efficiently and safely and in that respect is a distinct advantage to persons employed as life guards, for it enables them to perform rescue work in a manner which is otherwise thought to be impractical if not impossible. For example, the life guard while using devices incorporating my invention can much more easily stand erect in the water with chest and shoulders above water and thereby have the complete free use of his arms and hands in performing the rescue work. He can also much more readily support and propel the other person through the water because of the increased swimming efficiency which the devices provide.

Devices embodying my invention have special utility in that they permit a relaxation or the ankles which is desirable in advanced swimming. The devices are also highly efficient for increasing speed while swimming under water.

Devices embodying my invention may be used mers. The devices enable a person to attain what may be termed a propeller push which resembles the action of a fish fin or tail. The tapering of the devices affords a fish fin streamlining which gives an increased area of push or propulsion with a minimum of water resistance.

I am familiar with and in fact am the exclusive licensee under, United States Letters Patent 2,099,973, dated November 23, 1937, granted to Louis de Corlieu, for Life saving and swimming propelling device. Without minimizing the efficacy and scope of the invention claimed in that patent, I consider my invention to be an improvement and to have many advantages thereover, some of which may be enumerated as follows:

I dispense entirely with any and all metal reinforcements. I thereby decrease the weight of the devices and attain such advantages as increased flexibility, which is desirable while walking with the devices on dry land or in ridin surf boards and the like, and also while using the devices in the water; I eliminate the necessity of utilizing the type of crepe rubber which the aforementioned patent prefers in order to give buoyancy to the devices and I am thereby, able to use other forms of rubber or synthetic rubber, which are much more desirable and which have a longer life than does crepe rubber; I overcome the inherent disadvantages of metal which will rust and break and ‘bend while in use and which tends to tear the enclosing rubber structure under. certain conditions of use. The hazard of injury to the wearer which is ever present in the use of metal is entirely eliminated in my invention. My devices are also constructed so as to fit the feet of the wearer which advantage is attained by molding and curving the foot pocket over the instep so as to afford a snug but comfortable fit or closure.v

My invention attains still other advantages which result from improved structure and form over the invention of the aforementioned patent, and otherwise, and which will become obvious from a further description thereof.

An object of my invention is to provide in swim-fin of the character described a relatively flexible-construction which when in use in the water will adapt itself to the movement of the feet and legs while swimming, treading water, and the like, and which with a minimum of water resistance will afford an increased area of propulsion.

A further object of my invention is to provide in a swim-fin of the character described a proto the feet of a swimmer in substantially horizontal position;

Figure 2 is a top plan view of a pair of the line 8-6 of Figure 4.

Propelling device which may be utilized by beginners as well as by expert swimmers, life guards and others, and which materially increases the speed while swimming and which likewise increases the buoyancy of the body while at rest or “standing in the water.

Another object of my invention is to provide in a swim-fin of the character described a symmetrical stream-lined molded rubber device which is relatively simple and inexpensive to manufacture and which can be molded and manufactured in one piece. In such respect I wish to point out that devices which embody the invention of the aforementioned Patent 2,099,973 are made in approximately 18 pieces which are cemented together and which have all of the disadvantages which are inherent in such construction. For instance, pieces may pull apart while in use and devices embodying my invention will last longer and will stand considerably greater stress and strain than the other type of devices.

A still further object of my invention is to provide in a device of the character described a hole or orifice disposed in the bottom thereof, which permits the expulsion of water and sand which may collect in the foot pocket and which at the same time provides a suction cup or grip when the devices are used by a person standing or walking, on a slippery-.surface. such as surfboards, aquaplanes and the like.

Another object of. my invention is to prgvidefin a device of the character described reinforcing beads along the to and bottom sides thereof which afford sufficient firmness but at the same Devices incorporating my invention may be, made of rubber or of synthetic rubber ‘orTother-VI rubber substitutes and compounds.

Another advantage possessed by devices embodying my invention, is that identification marks and symbols and instructions may be molded or impressed in the rubber and will not wash or wear off, as would be the case if they’ were merely stamped, etc.

In the drawing: Figure 1 is a perspective of the devices attached Figure ‘7 is a horizontal cross-section taken on the line 1-1 of Figure 4.

Figure 8 is a horizontal cross-section taken on the line 8-8 of Figure 4.

The preferred form chosen to illustrate my invention comprises a left fin I and a right fin I. An elastic heel strap 2 constitutes the heel portion of the device and joins a central portion 3 which consists of a hollow wedge shaped foot pocket 4 having a convexly curved top 5 and bottom 8. An equivalent structure and form might eliminate the convex curvatures, but I prefer them as shown to conform to the instep and ball of the foot respectively.

It would be an equivalent to use a stronger or larger heel strap than the preferred form illustrated in my present application, or even to eliminate the heel strap entirely and to extend the foot pocket to the extreme rear end of the device.

A hole or orifice l is disposed in the bottom of the central portion for drainage purposes and to provide a suction cup on fiat surfaces.

The “toe portion 8 of the device which joins the central portion is relatively fiat and of increasing breadth and in the preferred form has a curved diagonal end 9, although a straight edge could be used. There are reinforcing tapered beads Ill extending along the upper and lower sides or edges of the central and toe portions of the device and which extend substantially to the end of the said toe” portion. It is important that these beads provide a firmness to the structure sufficient to withstand collapse under water pressure but sufficient fiexibility to permit a yielding of the fin progressively toward the toe portion as the fin is moved against the water.

The use of my invention may be described as follows: The left fin is placed on the left foot of the wearer and the right fin on the right foot, by inserting the foot within the foot pocket comprising the central portion, so that the heel strap engages the foot just above the heel or at the point where the Achilles tendon is located.

Due to the flexibility of the devices it will be found that the user is able to walk with comparative ease and unless the surface be especially rough or sharp, such as from rocks or glass, no injury to the devices will result. When the user is in the water he may employ the devices in the same manner as he would use his legs and feet without the devices, and with very little practice he will be able to augment the use of the feet and legs so as to propel himself through the water with materially increased speed and ease and with a minimum of discomfort and fatigue.

Whatever be the basic movement imparted to the fins by the wearer, such movement results in a propulsion generating at the heel and carried outwardly to the toe” of the fin. The streamlining or hydrodynamic shape, embodied in a structure flexible yet firm enough to withstand collapse under water pressure, utilizes an action similar to that of a fish’s fin or tail, and imparts a thrust during both oscillating movements of the foot.

The devices may be utilized for swimming, either in the normal position or on the back, and will afford increased speed notwithstanding the type of leg kick which may be employed.

It will also be found that a person wearing the devices may stand upright in the water by treading and expose a much greater portion of his body above the surface thereof than he would be able to do without the devices even with the hands employed as a supplementary means to keep afloat.

When standing on a wet, slippery surface such as an aquaplane or surf board, it will be found that the hole in the bottom of the center section will act as a suction cup more securely to hold the fin against the wet surface thereof. The hole will also act as an outlet for sand and water which might otherwise collect and remain in the foot pocket.

If the fin is used for life saving, it will be found that the user can readily support himself in an upright position in the water and have the full and free use of his arms and hands.

Persons learning to swim will be able to use the fins with equal facility and will find that the use thereof greatly reduces the time necessary in order to become an efficient swimmer.

Other uses and applications of devices embodying my invention will be obvious to anyone utilizing same and no attempt is made herein to enumerate all of those uses and objects.

Various modifications constituting equivalents may be used in the details of the device within the scope of my invention, and my invention is not to be limited to the preferred form which I have illustrated and described in this application.

I claim:

1. A swim-fin of resilient material, adapted to be mounted on the foot and embodying a hydrodynamic fin shape comprising a heel gripping section, a central section forming a pocket to receive the forepart of the foot, and a toe extension web continuing the natural wedge shape of the foot, the toe extension web having one side diverging with respect to the other toward the free end, and said end being diagonally formed whereby the outer side is longer than the inner side, the central section and the toe extension having a gradually increasing flexibility toward the said end.

2. A swim-fin of resilient material, adapted to be mounted on the foot and embodying a hydrodynamic fin shape comprising a heel gripping section, a central section forming a pocket to receive the forepart of the foot, and a toe extension web continuing the natural wedge shape of the foot, the said heel gripping section, central section and toe extending web having one side diverging with respect to the other from the heel toward the free end of the toe extension, the wedge being longer along the outer side than on the inner side, the end of the toe extension being substantially diagonal from the shorter side to the longer side, and marginal reinforcements along the said sides whereby the fin is rendered more flexible in the region of its medial longitudinal line than along its sides, tending to cup under resistance of water and displacing water with a propeller-like thrust when moved at right angles to the normal plane of said fin.

3. A swim-fin of resilient material adapted to be mounted on the foot and embodying a hydrodynamic fin shape comprising a heel gripping section, a central section forming a pocket to receive the forepart of the foot, and a toe extension web continuing the natural wedge shape of the foot, the said heel gripping section, central section and toe extension web having one side diverging with respect to the other from the heel toward the free end of the extension, the wedge being longer along the outer side than on the inner side, the end of the toe extension web being substantially diagonal from the shorter side to the longer side, and marginal reinforcements along the said sides whereby the fin is rendered more flexible in the region of its medial longitudinal lines than along its sides, tending to cup under resistance of water and displacing water with a propeller-like thrust when moved at right angles to the normal plane of said fin, said margina1 reinforcements comprising beads raised from the upper and lower surfaces of the fins whereby a directional thrust is imparted for the displacement of water longitudinally along the surfaces of the fin.

4. A swim-fin of resilient material adapted to be mounted on the foot and embodying a. hydrodynamic fin shape comprising a heel gripping section, a central section forming a pocket to receive the forepart of the foot, and a toe extension web continuing the natural wedge shape of the foot, the said heel gripping section, central section and toe extension web having one side diverging with respect to the other from the heel toward the free end of the extension, the wedge being longer along the outer side than on the inner side, the end of the toe extension web being substantially diagonal from the shorter side to the longer side, and marginal reinforcements along the said sides whereby the fin is rendered more flexible in the region of its medial longitudinal lines than along its sides, tending to cup under resistance of water and displacing water with a propeller-like thrust when moved at right angles to the normal plane of said fin, said marginal reinforcements comprising beads raised from the upper and lower surfaces of the fins whereby a directional thrust is imparted for the displacement of water longitudinally along the surfaces of the fin, and said beads terminating approximately the same distance short of the end of the toe extension web leaving the end unreinforced whereby it will tend to flex diagonally substantially parallel to the end edge thereof.

5. A swim-fin of resilient material, adapted to be mounted on the foot and embodying a hydrodynamic fin shape comprising a heel gripping section, a central section forming a pocket to receive the forepart of the foot, and a toe extension web having one side diverging with respect to the other toward the free end, the toe extension web being relatively thin throughout its medial portion, and having marginal beads relatively thick at their forward portion and tapering to merge into the planes of the web toward the end thereof, whereby the web is rendered increasingly flexible toward the end and a directional thrust is imparted for the displacement of water longitudinally along the surfaces of the fin,

OWEN P. CHURCHILL.

You can find the full text and other patents at:

http://www.google.com/patents/US2321009

Proning: Riding the Roots of Bodysurfing

Prone:

  1. likely to or liable to suffer from, do, or experience something, typically something regrettable or unwelcome.
  2. lying flat, especially face downward.
1912_Bodysurfers_Freshwater_Forbes_Myers_p1
Bodysurfers circa 1912

The Prone Form of bodysurfing is characterized by the rider leading with the head while aligning both arms parallel to the torso. Riding Prone, the bodysurfer experiences the Ocean nose-to-surface. This raw style puts the human processing center in full exposure to the elements. While riders still drop the wings and prone it from time to time, the prone position is the root of modern-day bodysurfing.

Postcard from Australia Circa 1911
Percy Spence : Surf Bathing – Shooting the Breakers, 1911.

If you were walking the beaches of Waikiki or in the 1900’s you would likely see Proning in action. The Prone position is the classical bodysurfing form. Riders would jump into waves before they had fins and ride straight as long as possible. To show style, a rider could hold up one foot and keep riding. It is unclear who was the first bodysurfer to break from Proning straight ahead to the beach. The break from prone form most likely developed concurrently with riding parallel to the shore with the breaking wave. There are many stories of people who began riding along the shore with one arm out the way surfers rode. Whether it was an early lifeguard on the California shores or native bodysurfing peoples of Polynesia or Hawaii it is clear our roots are in the belly-down, head-up position. As late as the 1960’s (footage below found on The Encyclopedia of Surfing), many bodysurfers around the world prefer the Prone position for wave gliding.

It could be argued that bodysurfing in the Prone position is a more intimate interaction. Bodysurfing on your belly leaves the rider eye to eye with the Ocean. The rider’s head is free from spray and the rest of the body is in full contact with the water as opposed to using a forward hand to plane. When riders use a forward hand to plane they naturally rotate their torso lifting one shoulder and some of the upper torso away from the water. This also causes a chain reaction pulling the head away from the surface of the Ocean. Many riders compensate for natural tendencies and force their face down the line, but in it’s most natural presentation Proning is the bodysurfer’s choice for feel.

The feeling may be multiplied by the vulnerability of the Prone Form. The most serious of injuries occur to a bodysurfer’s head, neck and back. There is no doubt that Proning, as the name implies, leaves the rider vulnerable to injury. Without a lead arm or arms, bodysurfers will make first impact on rock, reef and sand with their head. This is one of the many reasons the evolution of bodysurfing has moved beyond Proning.

When bodysurfers are in the layout position, leading with one arm, they are able to adjust to the changing steepness of the wave. This is mainly due to the great flexibility of the shoulder joint. If a wave suddenly turns from a mushy-spiller to a round barrel the rider can compensate with the lead hand to maintain planing surface. In the Prone position, bodysurfers are one-dimensional; therefore bodysurfers who ride Prone and ride it well are demonstrating expert ability. The Prone rider must be extremely observant of shifting wave movements, and then position him or herself with precision to ride out critical waves.

There are some riders who just like it. They may turn and Prone into the late barrel knowing there’s no hope of coming out the other side. His friends might even yell, “Canonball!” at the sight of such hopeless debauchery. Other bodysurfers look both ways and know the only way to feel this wave is to lock your arms to your side and launch straight for the sand. When the wave doesn’t give you left or right, you go straight simply because its fun.

Kyle and Kanea eyes up
The rider having the most fun…

There are variations of the Prone ride. In some old footage, you will see bodysurfers using one of their arms as a rudder to stall or change direction. When riding Prone, riders also vary the positioning of their head from down full speed ahead to chin fully extracted from the water and eyes at the sky. In all variations of this bodysurfing throwback, we share the thrilling sensations of wave pioneers long gone. We carry on the oldest wave riding tradition sliding on the surface with the purest joy.

-EJ

 

Sources:

No Lives Lost: The History of Surf Life Saving Club 1908-1958 via Surf Research

Encyclopedia of Surfing

Surf Research